What the Data Shows
Remote-meeting use is compared across small, medium and large Latvian enterprises in 2024. The three size-class rates use separate enterprise denominators, while the 34.0% all-enterprise rate is retained as a national benchmark. Large enterprises led at 86.0%, 28.7 percentage points above medium enterprises. Small enterprises were at 28.2%, leaving a 57.8-point gap between the largest and smallest size classes.
Data table
Unit: percent · Period: 2024
| Rank | Entry | Value | Period |
|---|
| 1 | Large enterprises (250+) | 86.0% | 2024 |
| 2 | Medium enterprises (50–249) | 57.3% | 2024 |
| 3 | Small enterprises (10–49) | 28.2% | 2024 |
| 4 | All enterprises | 34.0% | 2024 |
Sources
Source 1: ICT use in enterprises, 2024
Publisher: Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia
Dataset/table: Official Statistics of Latvia
Units: percent
Date checked: 2026-07-16
Evidence: Supports enterprises holding remote meetings for all, small, medium and large Latvian enterprises.
Data notes & caveats
Rates are percentages of enterprises within each size class. The all-enterprise total overlaps the size classes and is therefore not ranked as a fourth peer.
Methodology
The three enterprise-size classes are compared directly, while the all-enterprise rate is retained as the national benchmark rather than ranked as a fourth size class.
Source consistency notes
All percentages use the same official Latvian release, 2024 period, enterprise population and measurement basis.
Related graphics
LicensingBranded MarketStats graphics are free to use*
Keep the visible MarketStats attribution, source line and canonical page link intact. For clean unbranded assets, commercial use or higher-volume reuse, choose one of the licensing tiers below.
This specific graphic needs a source-rights review before an unbranded download. Branded use remains available.
* Free branded use is subject to the Terms and requires attribution/canonical-link preservation. MarketStats licenses the graphic presentation and MarketStats-created editorial layer, not the underlying third-party source data. Source attribution and source-provider obligations still apply.