Port throughput in million TEU; top five global ports plus Mundra as India’s comparison row.
The world’s largest container ports are ranked by 2024 throughput, with Mundra included as India’s largest listed port. The rows use Lloyd’s List values in million twenty-foot equivalent units for the global top five and one India comparison row. Shanghai ranked first at 51.5 million TEU, ahead of Singapore at 41.1 million and Ningbo-Zhoushan at 39.3 million. Four of the top five ports were in China, while Mundra ranked 25th at 8.2 million TEU.
| Rank | Entry | Value | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shanghai | 51.5M TEU | 2024 |
| 2 | Singapore | 41.1M TEU | 2024 |
| 3 | Ningbo-Zhoushan | 39.3M TEU | 2024 |
| 4 | Shenzhen | 33.4M TEU | 2024 |
| 5 | Qingdao | 30.9M TEU | 2024 |
| 25 | Mundra | 8.2M TEU | 2024 |
Source 1: Lloyd’s List
Publisher: Lloyd’s List
Dataset/table: One Hundred Container Ports 2025
Units: TEU
Date checked: 2026-05-28
Evidence: Supports 2024 container-throughput rankings for the top ports and India’s largest listed port.
TEU means twenty-foot equivalent unit. The row set is not a pure top-six ranking; Mundra is included because it is India’s largest listed port in the source ranking.
Rows use Lloyd’s List 2025 ranking values for 2024 port throughput. The SVG lists the global top five and keeps Mundra as a labelled India comparison row rather than treating it as rank six.
All port values use one Lloyd’s List ranking and one 2024 throughput year. The source is a reputable industry ranking, not an official global statistical-agency table.
Keep the visible MarketStats attribution, source line and canonical page link intact. For clean unbranded assets, commercial use or higher-volume reuse, choose one of the licensing tiers below.
This specific graphic needs a source-rights review before an unbranded download. Branded use remains available.
* Free branded use is subject to the Terms and requires attribution/canonical-link preservation. MarketStats licenses the graphic presentation and MarketStats-created editorial layer, not the underlying third-party source data. Source attribution and source-provider obligations still apply.
